Pope Francis disparages Medjugorje ‘apparitions’- why all Catholics must reject them

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-medjugorje-idUSKCN18A0E8

In marking the 100th Anniversary of the first apparition of Our Lady of Fatima, Pope Francis traveled top Fatima and canonized the two younger shepherd children, Francisco and Jacinta.  Despite the numerous problems associated with this act(the horrendously modern-looking church used, the dubious canonization process), this recognition should be praised as positive for the universal Church and her members.

Pope Francis unfortunately spoke several more questionable statements and novelties over the weekend, many of which you may read about on other traditional websites.  However, many statements made were quite interesting, such as these remarks on the Medjugorje “apparitions”(from the attached link above):

“‘The (commission) report has its doubts. I personally am more nasty. I prefer the Madonna as mother, our mother, and not a Madonna who is the head of a telegraph office, who every day sends a message at such-and-such an hour. This is not the Mother of Jesus,” he said.

“Who thinks that the Madonna says, ‘Come tomorrow at this time, and at such time I will deliver a message to that visionary?'” he said.

But Francis acknowledged that some people who go to Medjugorje experience a spiritual renewal and “encounter God, change their lives.

Although these remarks were made in another off-the-cuff airplane interview and in his usual speaking style, the Holy Father has done much good here.  He notes the questionable results of the Commission to investigate these apparitions and comments on the rather erratic, unusual behavior of who supposedly is the “Madonna”.  Will all of those Medjugorje devotees preach obedience to the Holy Father here, as they usually criticize us for not obeying?  Some may, but others have highlighted his words that this is his personal opinion.

While these are good reasons to question these claimed visions, there are other reasons why Catholics are obliged to reject them.  For one, it is doubtful that the children are often even in ecstasy much of the time, as proven by the French journalist who made a seer flinch when he snapped his fingers by her face.  But the main reason we must condemn the Medjugorje craze is the many “ecumenical” statements made by “Our Lady” to multiple seers affirming that all religions are dear to her Son and that we cannot be believers if we do not respect other religions as well.  Clearly such remarks are both blasphemous and heretical.  So the Mother of God would not distinguish between individuals and the false religions themselves?  We are required under pain of sin not to accept these statements, and this is what particularly dooms the Medjugorje visions.  It is unsettling that the Pope did not mention these questions, perhaps because he unfortunately finds no problem with them.  These affirmations differ very little from those made at Vatican II concerning the ecumenical movement.

But why then are there several examples of conversions from visiting Medjugorje?  A short excerpt from sspx.org:

“…However, Dan Burke at the National Catholic Register points out that although God can bring good out of evil if He chooses, among the evil fruits of Medjugorje are disobedience and disrespect of the local bishop in a matter clearly within the purview of his authority. It is concerning that this disobedience supported and encouraged by the supposed messages of Our Lady through the “seers.”

Moreover, the personal lives of a number of the disobedient clerics involved with the apparitions do not stand up to scrutiny.”

The good intention of a soul may move the Hand of God to provide the necessary graces, but this does not justify these supposed “visions”. We must reject the falsehoods present and defend the honor and glory of Our Lady.  For a comprehensive refutation of the Medjugorje apparitions, here is the full, acclaimed work of the late traditional writer, Michael Davies:

http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/medjugorje-a-warning-michael-davies.pdf

Mr. Davies’ book has been of great assistance to souls trying to see through this dangerous cloak thinly covering such a diabolical manifestation.  Let us act accordingly and help souls to see the truth, while praying that the Authorities continue to oppose these visions, but in a more clear, defined manner.

 

~ Steven C.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Pope Francis disparages Medjugorje ‘apparitions’- why all Catholics must reject them

  1. Steven C. Post author

    Marysong, thanks for your comment. Of course, one could say he probably should have stated more than his “personal opinion” here, but I doubt he’ll end up approving it.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Steven C. Post author

      Maria, thank you very much for the question.

      Garabandal is a very complex topic and more difficult to outright affirm (e.g. Fatima) or condemn(e.g. Medjugorje). In fact, I could probably write entire posts about it. However, to briefly summarize:

      Garabandal is not an officially approved apparition of the Church. There is no requirement for a Catholic to believe it or even endorse it. The seers were clearly in ecstasy, but the question is whether these apparitions were from Heaven.

      Much of the messages given do not contradict Church teaching. There are even some very interesting sentences, possibly explaining a crisis in the Church. In this video, Fr. Gruner discusses a couple of these points, but makes clear that this apparition is not officially approved. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2T55nsW5PU

      However, there are many arguments given in favor of great caution. You might read a few of them here: http://www.unitypublishing.com/Apparitions/Garabandal2.html I do not necessarily endorse every single statement made in this document, but I find the argument to be overall a certainly valid one.

      A couple of additional points in response to rumors:

      IF Garabandal in any way affirmed how great of a council Vatican II would be, then it is definitely not from Heaven.

      IF Padre Pio believed that Our Lady was appearing in Garabandal (a claim which I am not sure has substantial proof), it would not necessarily then have to be an infallible statement.

      Although the seers often contradict each other and seem confused, the seers say that Heaven has indicated that this is because they will mirror the crisis in the Church.

      I hope this answer will help you. I might dedicate a post to it one day, but let us by all means remain faithful to the Message of Fatima, which we are confident is from Our Lady, as a most important message for our time.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s